Quality of Life of Nigerians with Unilateral Lower Limb Amputation
Purpose: The aims of this study were to determine the QoL of Nigerians with lower limb amputation and to investigate the influence of some clinical and socio-demographic variables on it.
Method: Forty-seven individuals with lower limb amputation participated in this study. Participants’ age, gender, marital status, occupation, time since amputation, level of amputation, affected limb and use of prosthesis were recorded. Quality of life was then measured using the WHO QOL-BREF. Data were analysed using mean and standard deviation, Mann-Whitney U test and Kruskal-Wallis test at 0.05 alpha levels.
Results: Participants’ overall health and QoL scores were 3.6(SD 0.9) and 3.9(SD 0.7) respectively. Male subjects had significantly higher scores than females in the domains of physical health (p = 0.007), social relationships (p = 0.024) and overall health (p = 0.012). Prosthesis-wearing subjects scored significantly higher in the domains of physical health (p = 0.015), psychological health (p = 0.008) and environment (p = 0.011) and overall health (0.033), than those not wearing prosthesis. Level of amputation, leg dominance and pre-amputation occupational category had no significant influence on participants’ QoL.
Conclusion: The findings of this study suggest that the QoL of individuals with lower limb amputation in Nigeria is moderate. The only factors which have significant influence on some QoL domains are gender and use of prosthesis.
Implications: Individuals with lower limb amputation, particularly females and those not wearing prosthesis, require special attention. Clinicians should identify barriers to the use of prosthesis so as to enhance their quality of life.
Keywords
Authors
How to Cite
Download Citation
License
Copyright © 2013 The Author(s)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License By-NC-ND 4.0 that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access ).
Similar Articles
- Sunil Deepak, Jayanth Kumar, Bapu Santosh, Suresh Gornalli, Praveen Manikappa, Umadevi Vyjantha, Ramesh Giriyappa, Violence Against Persons with Disabilities in Bidar District, India , Disability, CBR & Inclusive Development: Vol. 25 No. 2 (2014): Summer 2014
- Tamara Lee Schindeler, Heather M Aldersey, Community-Based Rehabilitation Programming for Sex(uality), Sexual Abuse Prevention, and Sexual and Reproductive Health: A Scoping Review , Disability, CBR & Inclusive Development: Vol. 30 No. 1 (2019): Spring 2019
- Natiara Mohamad Hashim, Noor Ayuni Che Zakaria, Abdul Halim Abdullah, Rohana Ngah, Mohd Ali Bahari Abdul Kadir, Creating an Inclusive Ecosystem through Healthcare in Disability Management: Malaysians’ Experience , Disability, CBR & Inclusive Development: Vol. 33 No. 1: (Spring) - 2022
- Tumenbayar Batdulam, Ochir Chimedsuren, Davaatseren Uranchimeg, Byambaa Enkhtsetseg, Environmental Accessibility Assessment for People with Vision, Hearing and Speech Disabilities in Mongolia , Disability, CBR & Inclusive Development: Vol. 30 No. 3 (2019): Autumn 2019
- Zohaib Aftab, Ahmad Zohaib Zaidi, Faraz Shafi, User Satisfaction with Conventional Lower-Limb Orthotic Devices: A Cross-Sectional Survey in Pakistan , Disability, CBR & Inclusive Development: Vol. 31 No. 3 (2020): Autumn
- M Miles, The ‘Social Model of Disability’ Met a Narrative of (In)Credulity: A Review , Disability, CBR & Inclusive Development: Vol. 22 No. 1 (2011): Spring
- Regina Celia Fiorati, Regina Y Dakuzaku Carretta, Karine Pereira Joaquim, Aline Ferreira Placeres, Tiago Silva Jesus, Anticipated Barriers to Implementation of Community-Based Rehabilitation in Ribeirão Preto, Brazil , Disability, CBR & Inclusive Development: Vol. 29 No. 1 (2018): Spring 2018
- Gert VanRooy, Elina Amadhila, Hasheem Mannan, Joanne McVeigh, Malcolm MacLachlan, Mutamad Amin, Core Concepts of Human Rights and Inclusion of Vulnerable Groups in the Namibian Policy on Orthopaedic Technical Services , Disability, CBR & Inclusive Development: Vol. 23 No. 3 (2012): Autumn
- Ernest Appiah Kyei, Joslin Dogbe, Participation of Persons with Disabilities in Political Activities in Kumasi Metropolis, Ghana , Disability, CBR & Inclusive Development: Vol. 31 No. 2 (2020): Summer 2020
- Dada Olumide Olasunkanmi, Sanya Arinola Olasumbo, Constraint - Induced Movement Therapy: Determinants and Correlates of Duration of Adherence to Restraint use Among Stroke Survivors with Hemiparesis , Disability, CBR & Inclusive Development: Vol. 22 No. 3 (2011): Winter
You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.
Most read articles by the same author(s)
- Christopher Olusanjo Akosile, Christian Arinze Okonkwo, Fatai Adesina Maruf, Emmanuel Chiebuka Okoye, Life Accomplishment, Social Functioning and Participation of South-Eastern Nigerians with Lower Limb Amputation , Disability, CBR & Inclusive Development: Vol. 31 No. 2 (2020): Summer 2020