Pattern of Sedentary Activity among Persons with Neu-ro-developmental Disabilities: A Scoping Review
Abstract
Aim: The global prevalence of Neuro-developmental Disorders (NDDs) is alarming, with approximately 316.8 million cases identified. Individuals with NDDs are reportedly less physically active compared to their peers. However, reviews are limited, focusing on sedentary patterns of individuals with NDDs alongside disorder-specific data. This study aims to identify disorder-specific patterns and factors influencing sedentary lifestyles in this population.
Method: The review followed PRISMA-ScR guidelines and Arksey and O’Malley’s framework, with study selection guided by the JBI Population–Concept–Context (PCC) approach. Searches were conducted in PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and Google Scholar using keywords such as “sedentary activity,” “screen time,” “sitting time,” “neurodevelopmental disorders,” “ASD,” “ADHD,” and “intellectual disability,” combined with Boolean operators “AND” and “OR.” Eligible studies were peer-reviewed articles examining sedentary patterns in individuals with NDDs. Review articles, studies on typically developing populations, and studies addressing only physical activity were excluded.
Results: A total of 19 articles were entitled for this study, involving 27,180 samples. Screen media usage was the most common form of sedentary activity among individuals with NDDs. Other sedentary activities were reading, imaginative play, playing with toys, crafting, indoor games, and playing musical instruments. Screen time was higher among individuals with Autism Spectrum Disorder (ASD) (2 to 7 hours/day) and Intellectual Disability (2 to 10 hours/day) compared to other groups. Moreover, sedentary time was higher on weekends compared to weekdays.
Conclusion: The findings indicate that individuals across all age groups with NDDs exceed the ideal screen time limits. Disorder traits, physical and socio-economic barriers, and quality of life influence sedentary behaviors. The limited exploration of disorders, aside from a few observational studies in this context, highlights the need for broader, more comprehensive research.
Limitation: The absence of a preregistered protocol may reduce methodological transparency and increase the potential for bias.
Full text article
Authors
Copyright (c) 2026 The Author(s)

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License By-NC-ND 4.0 that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).