Users’ Satisfaction with Assistive Devices in Afghanistan
Purpose: The objective of this study was to assess users’ satisfaction and effectiveness of assistive devices in four regions of Afghanistan, namely Mazar-e-Sharif, Ghazni, Jalalabad and Taloqan.
Method: A random sample of 785 users, who were provided with 874 mobility and assistive devices in four regional prosthetic and orthotic workshops of the Swedish Committee for Afghanistan (SCA), participated in the study.
Results: The study revealed that the majority of the participants rated the assistive devices as very useful. While 45% of respondents even described them as excellent, 49% expressed a good level of satisfaction with the services they received at treatment centres. Similarly, the majority of respondents (67%) mentioned a maximum level of improvement, while 15% claimed to have witnessed some improvement in their physical condition. Fitting, comfort, and ease of use, along with durability, weight and appearance were rated as the most important factors of assistive devices. On the other hand, slow service and limited access to maintenance and repair facilities were identified as reasons for dissatisfaction.
Conclusion: The study provided continuous and valuable information to rehabilitation professionals regarding device effectiveness and satisfaction. The findings also recommended a stronger focus on comfort and usefulness of mobility and assistive devices. Lastly, the study suggested that lack of local device-repair service needs to be addressed by rehabilitation professionals.
Keywords
Authors
How to Cite
Download Citation
License
Copyright © 2019 The Author(s)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License By-NC-ND 4.0 that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access ).
Similar Articles
- Jo Durham, Vanphanom Sychareun, Phonevilay Santisouk, Kongmany Chaleunvong, Users’ Satisfaction with Prosthetic and Orthotic Assistive Devices in the Lao People’s Democratic Republic: A Cross-sectional Study , Disability, CBR & Inclusive Development: Vol. 27 No. 3 (2016): Autumn 2016
- Tagore Govindarajan, Assistive Devices for Persons with Visual Impairment and Low Vision: Preferences and Expectations of Users in the Southern States of India , Disability, CBR & Inclusive Development: Vol. 33 No. 1: (Spring) - 2022
- Jessica O'Dowd, Malcolm MacLachlan, Chapel Khasnabis, Priscille Geiser, Towards a Core Set of Clinical Skills for Health-Related Community Based Rehabilitation in Low and Middle Income Countries , Disability, CBR & Inclusive Development: Vol. 26 No. 3 (2015): Autumn 2015
- Ritu Ghosh, Vennila Palanivelu, Emma Tebbutt, Sunil Deepak, Training of Mid-Level Rehabilitation Workers for Community-Based Rehabilitation Programmes , Disability, CBR & Inclusive Development: Vol. 31 No. 4 (2020): Winter
- Doly Bokalial, Md. Forhad Hossain, N.S. Senthil Kumar, Shristi Bajracharya, Effectiveness of Community-Based Rehabilitation on the lives of Parents of Children with Cerebral Palsy: A Mixed Method Study in Karnataka, India , Disability, CBR & Inclusive Development: Vol. 31 No. 3 (2020): Autumn
- Fleur Heleen Boot, Ritu Ghosh, John Gerard Dinsmore, Malcolm MacLachLan, Views and Experiences of People with Intellectual Disabilities to Improve Access to Assistive Technology: Perspectives from India , Disability, CBR & Inclusive Development: Vol. 31 No. 4 (2020): Winter
- Heather Aldersey, Mohammad Morshedul Quadir, Soniya Akter, Rabiul Hossain Mozumder, Nayma Nazneen, Reshma Parvin Nuri, Barriers and Facilitators for Wheelchair Users in Bangladesh: A Participatory Action Research Project , Disability, CBR & Inclusive Development: Vol. 29 No. 2 (2018): Summer 2018
- Hester M van Biljon, Bianca Salie, Jancke C van Wyk, Jessica Daniel, Lize-Mari Kersop, Michaela Naidoo, Lana van Niekerk, Access to Public Healthcare Rehabilitation Services by Persons with Disabilities in South Africa: a Scoping Review , Disability, CBR & Inclusive Development: Vol. 33 No. 3: (Autumn) - 2022
- Raymond Tosoc, Rolando Lazaro, The Effectiveness of Community-Based Interventions in Improving Activities of Daily Living and Quality of Life Outcomes in Persons Living with Stroke: a Systematic Review , Disability, CBR & Inclusive Development: Vol. 32 No. 4: Winter 2021
- Maria Luisa Toro, Yasmin Garcia, Alejandra Manoela Ojeda, David J Dausey, Jon Pearlman, Quantitative Exploratory Evaluation of the Frequency, Causes and Consequences of Rehabilitation Wheelchair Breakdowns delivered at a Paediatric Clinic in Mexico , Disability, CBR & Inclusive Development: Vol. 23 No. 3 (2012): Autumn
You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.